“Palin Revealed” the lead-in to “Biden Revealed”

Have you ever seen the wrap-up for one show segue into the beginning of another show without a commercial in between?  Sometimes.  How about where minutes tick off the clock into the 2nd show, and still no “top-of-the-hour” commercial break?  Read the rest of this entry »

Sarah Palin versus the Seneca County Treasurer

I hope Sarah Palin makes a campaign appearance in Tiffin, Ohio.  Perhaps she could inspire long-time Seneca County Treasurer Marguerite Bernard to raise the bar of government accountability a little higher.

Sarah Palin says she puts government on the side of the people.  Really.  Among the list of accomplishments that support her assertion is that the checkbook for the state of Alaska is posted on the internet for the people to see how the funds are spent.  WOW!  It was so easy to navigate to the checking account page from Alaska’s Home Page!  Why isn’t the MSM talking about this?  We all know how one of the pet issues of the media is the Freedom of Information Act.  The state’s checkbook online?  The media has to LOVE Sarah Palin for that.  The MSM doesn’t even have to file any FOIA requests.  Yet,  . . . they don’t love Sarah Palin for that.  It’s yet another demonstration of how “in-the-tank-for-Obama” the MSM really is.  If the MSM is really fair and balanced, they would survey all 50 states in the USA and find out how many of them post their checkbooks online.  I haven’t heard that figure reported yet.

And just how monumental an accomplishment is it that a state posts its checkbook on the internet?

Consider this:  Seneca County, Ohio, which has about 60,000 residents, hasn’t even been able to balance its checkbooks more than a month after the office of Mary Taylor, Auditor for the State of Ohio, said that the bank statements and the checkbook figures don’t match each other.  The Tiffin Advertiser-Tribune reported on August 6th that the discrepancy between the two was $813,456.  That’s not pocket change.

Recently retired County Auditor Larry Beidelschies was the first to alert Seneca County, back in March of this year, that the checkbook was out of balance.  Beidelschies was in the process of gathering records for Mary Taylor’s audit when he made the discovery.

The audit did not reveal any embezzlement or egregiously inappropriate expenditures.  It’s just that when bank statements were issued, no one in Marguerite Bernard’s office compared the dollar amounts on the statements to the figures in the county checkbooks.  Apparently, the bank made some errors and shorted Seneca County’s accounts.

Though much of the discrepancy was discovered right away to be an error on the part of National City Bank, there was still a reported $40,000 gap by August 7th (which turned out to be untrue, as we will find out later), which is still not pocket change.  The Advertiser-Tribune editorialized that such performance is still sub-standard for a county treasurer who has been in office since the 1980’s.  The A-T editorial went a step further by pointing out that Marguerite Bernard, the Democrat incumbent, faces a challenge from Republican Damon Alt, who voters might choose to replace Bernard this November.

By August 13, Marguerite Bernard assured the commissioners that the $40,000 variance had been corrected.  County Commissioner Ben Nutter, though had met with both Bernard and National City Bank and reported that the checkbook was still not in balance as of August 19.  In an A-T report of August 22, Bernard assured the County Commissioners that the checkbook could be reconciled by September 2nd, and that she was almost certain the books were balanced through June 2007.  Auditor Beidelschies, noting that almost certain isn’t good enough, suggested that the books could still be out of balance dating back to 2006.  Bernard asserted the June 2007 date, because she says that’s when the State of Ohio began to wire funds to the counties instead of issuing checks, and the new wire transfer method complicated things.

On August 24, the A-T reported a meeting between the County Commissioners and Bernard.  Apparently the County Auditor’s office had offered, on several prior occasions, to help reconcile the checkbook, but Bernard had turned away those offers of assistance, so the Commissioners let it be known that they expected Bernard to let the Auditor assist.  By August 26, Bernard had met with a representative of the Auditor’s office.  As a side note, an interim replacement for Beidelschies was named, as his retirement date was set at August 31.

With the County Auditor finally on the case, by August 29, another discovery was made:  A second checkbook was out of balance! All this time, Bernard had acted with resentment that others had been looking over her shoulder, and she’d kept insisting that her office could correct everything without assistance and without prodding, but the evidence of the Treasurer’s incompetence keeps growing!  Would Alaska Governor Sarah Palin have had the same attitude as Marguerite Bernard?  Quite the contrary.  Bernard doesn’t want prying eyes looking at the county’s checkbooks, but Palin put’s Alaska’s checkbook online for all eyes to see!  Beidelschies suggested that Seneca County get help from the State of Ohio to balance the checkbooks, which the A-T heartily agreed to in an editorial.

Treasurer Bernard missed her own September 2nd target date as the A-T reported on the 3rd that the checking accounts still weren’t reconciled.  On September the 7th, the A-T reported that the County Prosecutor, Ken Egbert, Jr., was to also be part of meetings between Bernard, the Commissioners, and the Auditor’s office.  In the A-T of September 9th, it’s reported that the meeting of the previous day got ugly.  A seemingly indignant Bernard attempted to walk out of the meeting part way through the proceedings! She didn’t want to continue to answer questions!  Bernard said she had the variance down to 28 cents, which finally is pocket change, but the representative from the Auditor’s office said that they had seen no verification of Bernard’s assertion.  Bernard handed over a bank statement from July 2008 that had hand-written notes showing her attempt to reconcile the account, but the Auditor’s office said that they hadn’t seen the documents to back up the hand-written scrawls. and hadn’t even seen verification that a $99,000 discrepancy dating back to 2007 had ever been reconciled!  The County Auditor’s office wanted to see ALL the documentation, and Bernard still wasn’t being accommodating.  County Commissioner David Sauber said that he contacted State Auditor Mary Taylor’s office and State Treasurer Richard Cordray’s office asking them how Seneca County should proceed.

In an A-T report from September 11th, we learn that after the state audit was made public in early August, the remaining discrepancy out of the original $813,466 wasn’t just $40,000, as had previously been asserted.  It was actually in the ballpark of $200,000, and the County Auditor still hadn’t verified that a portion of that, in the amount of $99,000, had been reconciled.  The next day, the A-T reported that Bernard provided more documentation, but that the County Commissioners still believe that progress on the matter is too slow in coming, so they are considering hiring outside help to solve the matter.  Julie Adkins, the incoming County Auditor who is replacing the retired Beidelschies, said that the Auditor’s office didn’t have the manpower to continue work on the checkbooks.  Commissioner David Sauber hadn’t heard any reply from Richard Cordray’s office yet, but Mary Taylor’s office proposed that Seneca County could hire the Local Government Services Agency (LGSA), a state agency affiliated with Taylor’s office, to reconcile the checkbooks.  The County Commissioners want to obtain an estimate of how much LGSA’s services would cost the county, plus hear from Cordray’s office, before deciding how to proceed.

It is now September 14th, and Seneca County’s checkbooks still aren’t in balance, and an experienced County Treasurer is miffed at all the hubbub over the entire affair.  Contrast that with Sarah Palin and the transparency that she has committed the Alaskan government to, and you see that one is a public servant who doesn’t really like the public, and the other is a public servant who empowers her public.

There is yet more evidence of Sarah Palin’s attempts to reform government to put it on the side of the people, but I’m impressed by just the checkbook, alone.

I hope Palin comes to Tiffin soon and urges a vote for not only the McCain-Palin ticket, but a vote for Bernard’s election opponent, Damon Alt, as well.

Finally, I hope the MSM reports back about how many of the 50 states put their checkbooks online like Alaska does.

A fictional tale: “Is the fix in?”

On September 11th, this year, Senator Barack Obama lunched with former President Bill Clinton.  What do you think they talked about?  I let my imagination run away with me, and here’s what I heard as a hypothetical fly on the wall . . .

Obama: Bill, I’m glad you invited me to lunch today.  I could use a few pointers.

Clinton:  I thought you might.

Obama:  I’ve done my best to tell that lie over and over and over again about McCain being the same thing as Bush, but I just haven’t been able to get people to buy into it the way people bought into your lie about not having sex with that woman, Monica Lewinsky.  The polls are headed the wrong way.

Clinton:  Listen to me, Barack, and listen well.  You don’t have to tell any lies until you have to file an affidavit under oath.  You should get the media to tell the lies for you so you can stay above the fray.

Obama: I try to get the media to work with me, but they’ve been to busy lavishing their attention on Sarah Palin.

Clinton:  Just say the word, and I’ll make sure that changes.

Obama: You can do that?

Clinton: Barack, I’ll have the media eating out of your hands.

Obama: Are you really that powerful, still?

Clinton:  Barack, there’s a lot you don’t know about me.  That’s OK.  You don’t need to know.  I just need some assurances from you.

Obama: Like what, Bill?

(Clinton leans in close to Obama’s ear and whispers very quietly while Obama’s eyes bulge and his jaw drops.)

Obama: (stammering)  Well, ah,  sure . . . Bill.  Um . . . yeah,  . . . uh . . . and you promise me the media will be  . . . uh . . . eating out of my hands?

Clinton:  You just watch.  The media will turn a blind eye to anything amiss with you and Joe Biden.  They will absolutely rip McCain and Palin to shreds.

Obama:  You’re sure about that?

Clinton:  Let’s play a simple word association game.  Ready?

Obama:  OK

Clinton: Paula Jones

Obama: Trailer park trash.

Clinton: See?  She’s the sexual harassment victim, but I’m the distinguished elder statesman while she’s just trailer park trash.  Nobody ever, ever, made the suggestion that I was the least bit sexist for using her, did they?

Obama: (eyes widening) You know something, Bill?  You’re right!  That was just masterful how you manipulated the coverage that way.

Clinton:  You came to see the right person, Barack.  I have . . . powerful . . . connections.  You just watch, Barack.  You’ll see fewer and fewer Republican pundits on the networks to present any opposing views as the news anchors just rake McCain and Palin over the coals.  When they convene panels of experts to offer political analysis, it’ll be just journalists and a few Democrats,  . . . but mostly journalists, just to increase the distance between you and the mudslinging.  If a Republican pundit is on a panel, they’ll get less than two seconds to give a sound bite before they’re cut off.  It’s going to be beautiful, Barack.  ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, they’ll all do the dirty work for you.

Obama:  And Fox News?

Clinton:  Think positive, Barack.  Fox News is living on borrowed time.  Once you’re in the White House, the Fairness Doctrine will take care of Fox News.

Obama: (with a faraway look) Yeah . . . the Fairness Doctrine.

Clinton: Is it a deal?

Obama:  Sure,  . . . um . . . how soon will this all start?

Clinton: Tomorrow, if you like.

Obama:  Just like that?

Clinton:  Just like that . .  if you just say the word.

Obama: Cool.  Deal.  It’s a deal, Bill.

Clinton:  You know, Barack, you should have never disparaged the old style of politics.  Old style politics can be a powerful ally.

Obama:  Oh, you mean that talk about change and a new kind of politics?  Do you think I meant all that?  If you thought that, then maybe I’m getting almost as slick as you, Bill.  Maybe I’m almost there, after all.

(Obama and Clinton emerge from the room to greet reporters while exhanging winks and grinning ear to ear. I wish I could have heard what Clinton whispered to Obama.)

Family prepared? Big economic storm coming?

I have a recommendation for every household this weekend: stockpile food and other household goods–perhaps 3 months worth.  The financial house of cards on Wall Street is ready to collapse.  It might happen next week, it might happen next month, it might happen next year, but our nation’s financial foundations are not on good footing.

In a prior post, I urged the Federal government to not bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  It looks like the fix is in and they will be bailed out.  Lehman Brothers is apparently pleading for federal guarantees so that someone will acquire it.  A decision is expected by Sunday.  Other financial institutions are at risk, as are other industries.  Whether the Federal government bails everybody out or not, there is a risk that our currency could take a big hit, and if that happens, expect an inflation spike.  If inflation spikes, expect that the stuff on store shelves will be really expensive.  If you can manage it, I think it’s good to keep a stockpile on hand to keep your family afloat no matter what happens to the financial markets.

With a short-term inflation spike, some prices won’t be able to move much, such as rent (already stipulated in a lease agreement), mortgage (a contract already agreed to when you purchased your home), and utilities (utility companies would have to get the state of Ohio to agree to a tax hike before they could raise their rates).  Prices of anything not already locked in, though, could skyrocket.

Of course, we are already experiencing financial distress in Ohio, but, believe it or not, it really can get worse.  Among those who think it could get worse is Governor Ted Strickland, who is trimming the state budget to anticipate impending shortfalls rather than tap the state’s “rainy day” fund. (Hat tip to Lisa Renee at Glass City Jungle.)

On the lighter side, maybe another step one can take to prepare one’s family for a nationwide financial collapse is to obtain fishing licenses and hunting licenses, so if food temporarily becomes too expensive, we can gather it ourselves, just like Sarah Palin’s family fishes and hunts for food.  It’s too late to plant a vegetable garden now, but you might want to plan on planting one next year.

Speaking of hunting, the deer population in Ohio is many, many, many times larger today than it ever was at the time the state was first settled.  According to early accounts of Ohio at the time of settlement, Ohio was wall-to-wall carpeted in trees with very few clearings.  The forest canopy shut out sunlight necessary for thick forest undergrowth, so deer didn’t have a lot to feast on in Ohio.  The Native American populations were also small in Ohio, as hunting was not as successful here as elsewhere because of the relative lack of game.  Often, the Miami nation, that inhabited SW Ohio, would make major hunting treks into Indiana and Kentucky, where game was much more plentiful.  These days, there’s lots for deer to forage upon in Ohio, and the large size of the deer population reflects that fact.

In any event, I encourage families to have a meeting to launch an action plan to be prepared in case of severe economic shocks.

Ketchikan (International) Airport

Ketchikan, Alaska is not a large town, with perhaps 8 or 9 thousand within the city itself with another 7 thousand living outside it but on the same island.  Though you have to take a boat or plane to reach Ketchikan (as you cannot drive there by car), you can imagine that the airport at Ketchikan is not all that big.

As I mentioned in my prior post, I’ve been to Ketchikan twice.  During my visit this June, our tour guide pointed out that the locals get to brag that their airport is an “international”  airport.  The story of the “international” designation dates back to September 11, 2001, the day 4 commercial passenger jets were hijacked by terrorists and crashed into the World Trade Center in New York City, the Pentagon in the Virginia suburbs of DC, and a farm field in Pennsylvania.

All planes were ordered to be grounded across the USA and Canada that day.  International flights bound for the USA that day were re-routed to Canada.  A Canadian commercial passenger jet en-route between two Canadian locations happened to be closer to Ketchikan’s airport, so when the plane was ordered to be grounded, the plane was told to land in Ketchikan.  The pilot looked down at the relatively short runway in relation to the size of the aircraft he was flying.  Reportedly, his reaction was, “I have to land THIS on THAT????”  The plane landed safely.  That’s the story of Ketchikan’s first international flight arriving and departing from their humble airport.

Since that time, the runway has been lengthened for purposes of homeland security in case jets have to make emergency landings there in the future.

The Ketchikan airport is not located on the island that the city of Ketchikan is on.  Instead, the airport is located on an island populated by 50 persons, but the airport’s island is close to Ketchikan’s island.  There is just a narrow channel of water separating the two islands.  People going back and forth between the airport and Ketchikan must take a ferry across that channel.  There once was some talk of building a bridge to link the two islands, but that idea was shot down, as that proposed bridge was the infamous “bridge to nowhere.”

Perhaps that story might offer a slight idea of why certain politicians might have been for the bridge before they were against the bridge.

“Where men are men and women win the Iditarod”

My favorite quote from Sarah Palin’s speech at her homecoming in Alaska was the one that appears in the title.  Alaska is the state “where men are men and women win the Iditarod.” One of the feelings one gets from a Palin speech is a feeling of empowerment.

An Obama speech on the economy is one that is deflating, as he drives home a message that we just can’t make headway on the economy without the Federal government (led by an Obama-Biden White House, a filibuster-proof Democrat majority in the U.S. Senate, and a Democrat supermajority in the U.S. House of Representatives) rescuing us.  I don’t have confidence in our Congress.  So, if Obama and Biden tell me that they will partner with Congress to improve our economy, I have to say to myself that the outlook is quite bleak.  There is nothing empowering in the message of Obama.  It is a message of dependency designed to lure us toward greater socialism, and that path leads away from individual liberty.

Individual liberty is what has made us the best country on Earth, a position in the international pecking order that every other nation on earth envies.  The other nations will not become greater than America so long as their governments choose to retain more power than they relinquish to their people, and so long as we don’t allow our government to usurp more of the people’s power.

The reform message of McCain and Palin is an empowering one because it is couched in the candidates’ confidence in the people, not confidence in the government.

I am sure that the MSM, looking for dirt on Palin in Alaska, will find dirt.  Palin is not a perfect person, so I’m sure she’s made mistakes.  But she is not following in someone’s footsteps.  She’s blazing a new trail because the path that prior Alaskan governors took was one that led through quagmires of corruption.  There are times in my life that I blazed a new trail without a mentor, without footsteps of predecessors to tread in.  I made mistakes.  But I am so happy that I pushed back my horizons–those are the times in my life that are marked by achievements.  So, instead of looking at Sarah Palin to discover her mistakes, I’m looking at where the trail she blazed leads to.  It leads to government that subordinates itself more to the people.

Palin’s approval ratings hover around 80%.  It would be more useful for the MSM to discover what Palin is doing right than to only seek out the mistakes, and nothing more.  All the rest of the states have governors who make mistakes.  They could use a few pointers about how to do the job right.

The MSM thinks Palin’s approval ratings are an anomaly, an inexplicable phenomenon.  So they send their reporters to Alaska, commissioned with the task of finding Palin’s mistakes.  With those blinders on, the MSM will miss the explanation behind the approval ratings.  Let me assure the MSM that Sarah Palin did not arrive at the mountain top of public approval ratings by falling to the summit.  She climbed there.

I have been blessed to visit Alaska, the Last Frontier, on two occasions so far.  Alaska is very alluring.  I heartily recommend vacationing there.  I visited in July 2003 and in June of this year.  Let me give you a tiny peek at the land where men are men and women win the Iditarod.

DanielDouglasIsland

In Ketchikan I rode in a small boat over the waves (lots of small jellyfish visible in the water) to an abandoned cannery that now serves as a museum where tourists become acquainted with Alaska’s fishing industry.  I attended a lumberjack show where log-rolling, pole-climbing, and other extreme sports feats (some of which get televised on ESPN from time to time) take place in an outdoor arena where audience members become acquainted with the lumber industry.  Most striking of all Ketchikan tours, though, is a journey into the folklore of some of Alaska’s indigenous peoples, the Tlingits, as exhibited by the finest totem-pole carving in the world.

In Juneau, I visited the state capitol (without any tour guide), marveled at the wares in the numerous souvenir shops, took a tram ride up Mt. Roberts, toured some ghost town ruins on Douglas Island (the photo is from the shoreline of Douglas Island looking back across the channel to the mainland near where Juneau is situated), and most amazingly of all, took a bus past Mendenhall Glacier to board a boat to have an encounter with humpback whales.  When the captain of the boat spotted some orca and some humpback whales, he cut off the engines and passed around binoculars so we could glimpse these magnificent creatures.  He explained that Federal law required them to stop a certain distance away from the whales.  We watched a pod of humpback whales surround a school of herrings, and the captain remarked how rare it was that we, as tourists, happened upon a collective feeding ritual that professional marine biologists wait for hours and days to catch a glimpse of.  Our delights did not end there.  Three humpback whales decided to come meet our boat!  They swam to us!  They not only approached closely enough to touch them with an extended arm (we restrained ourselves from doing so), but they swam under the boat and emerged on the other side!  What a thrill!

I had the opportunity to take a ferry from Skagway to Haines.  From Haines, we studied the wildlife, from the tidal basin, to the grassy meadows, to the steep mountain slopes.  Bald eagles soar through the skies, bears forage for food, and mountain goats defy gravity as they clamber up steep cliffs.

Also from Skagway, we took a ride on the White Pass and Yukon Scenic Railway, with a voice over an intercom pointing out natural wonders, such as thundering waterfalls and seismic fault lines, while telling us the tales of the Klondike gold rush of 1898.  The cog railway took us from sea level in a valley scooped out by glaciers, up a steep grade along mountain cliffs to the summit of the White Pass at the Canadian border.  Our journey also proceeded through portions of British Columbia and the Yukon Territory before returning us to our cruise ship docked in the fjord at Skagway.

I’d like America to feel a little more like Alaska, a place where you can sense exhilarating freedom. America, where men are empowered to be men, women are empowered to win, and the people are sovereign.

Agents of change

McSame?  Sorry, Obama, that tag line isn’t working with me.

Frankly, there’s a lot of things you’ve been trying in the past week or so that doesn’t work with a lot of people.

You haven’t figured out where to take your campaign from this point on.  You are lashing out in several directions hoping something will stick.  The MSM is trying to help as much as they can, but they don’t know which direction to focus their attacks on, because you aren’t providing the leadership to point out the avenue that they should pursue.  The bloggers of the left, seeing that you aren’t directing the message, are stepping forward to try to help you out.  They are imaginative, as the left-blogging rumor mill is generating leads for the MSM to track down.  Unfortunately, the MSM has been arriving at dead ends on stories such as Palin mandating creationism instruction in Alaska’s public schools.  The rumors turn out not to be true.  The only clear message that America is getting from this consortium of your campaign, the MSM, and the left blogosphere, is that the Palin witchhunt is on.

And since we Americans can see that it is a witchhunt, the poll numbers show that a number of us are changing our minds about who the real change agents are.  Not only will the McCain ticket NOT be eight more years of the same, your ticket is now attempting to return us to the politics of personal destruction of past campaigns.  So much for change we can believe in.

Your words may say, “McCain-Palin does not represent change,” but your bewildered reactions say, “Whoa!  Too much change!”

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Note to Congress:  Don’t do it.  Don’t bail them out.

Yes, dominoes will topple in the economy.  People will blame you, the Congress, when our financial house of cards tumbles.  I know you see a bailout as a way to redeem yourselves, to at least stave off the blame.  But, guess what?  The American people don’t approve of your performance, anyway.  Look at it this way:  When it comes to Congressional approval ratings, you’ve got nothing to lose.  Go ahead and take the blame, and let Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac collapse.  Let the marketplace correct itself.

Congress, if you bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, do you know that it will cost $2 trillion?  If you spend $2 trillion, what will it do to the budget deficit?  What will it do to the national debt?  What items in our Federal budget will be displaced if you commit that much money to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?  Will it kill our defense budget at a time that we are waging a war on two fronts?

Guess what, Congress?  If you bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, how many more industries will you be bailing out?  The message you sent by bailing out Bear Stearns will only be magnified a hundred times when you bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  How many more Wall Street firms will ask for a bail out?  How many more of Bear Stearns ilk?  How many more banks?  Automakers?  Airlines?  Will you print more money to cover these trillions of dollars for the bailouts?  What will the increase in the money supply mean?  A worthless dollar?  Inflation that will put prices of household goods beyond the purchasing power of household budgets?  Will taxes have no choice but to go up?  Or will the interest on the national debt end up consuming more than whatever revenue the Federal government scrape together, and then find our Federal government in default?

When we let Enron go under, there was an economic earthquake in Houston.  But guess what?  Now, Houston is one of the best places to earn a wage and support a family.  When average wages are compared with the cost of living, Houston is tops in the nation for letting people take a crack at the American dream.  We let the market correct itself.  After the darkness, there will be a new dawn.

Congress, these firms that want to be bailed out engaged in bad behavior.  Terrible behavior.  Horrendous behavior.  They cheated in an attempt to get ahead.  They had their day in the sun.  Now it’s time to pay the piper.  Why should we let good money chase after bad?  We shouldn’t.  If our taxpayer dollars have to be spent on subsidizing anything (which I don’t think it does) in the private sector, why the worst performers?  Why not the best?

Trust capitalism to work out its own kinks.  Don’t socialize industries so huge that they’re too big for the Federal government to swallow.  The communist nations like the old Soviet Union fell because they let good money chase after bad, shoveling rubles into the money pit of industries that were corrupt, grossly inefficient, and totally lacking in innovation.

It is better for Wall Street to go belly up than for the nation, itself, to go belly up.

So I implore you, Congress, just don’t do it.  Don’t.

Lorain’s transportation grid

Word of Mouth, a blog for all things pertaining to the city of Lorain, Ohio, has recently revisited the discussion of Lorain’s shipping port on Lake Erie.  I feel it’s worthwhile to point my readers in that direction to weigh in on the discussion.  As WoM notes, I’ve written for their blog in the past.  Included in my past writings at Word of Mouth are my own thoughts about Lorain’s transportation infrastructure needs, presented in 3 installments: Part 1; Part 2; and Part 3.

Lorain

Here is a map to help visualize some of the improvements I proposed.  The existing limited-access divided highway routes are shown in magenta.  I proposed adding some limited-access divided highways, and those are mapped in red.

Bob Barr, Ron Paul, Barack Obama, and Sarah Palin

Barack Obama isn’t the only one who is trying to figure out how to step out of the shadow of Sarah Palin.  I think Bob Barr and Ron Paul have to be concerned, as well.

I was among the Republicans who might have cast a vote for Bob Barr in November had John McCain picked a liberal VP nominee.  If Bob Barr had siphoned off enough Republican votes, Barack Obama could win the election with a minority of the popular vote, just like Clinton did when Ross Perot was in the running.  I think the Republican base has been so energized now, with Palin on the McCain ticket, that Bob Barr will lose traction with those who had entertained thoughts of defecting.

By all accounts, Ron Paul had a successful convention of his own in the Twin Cities.  But when the roll call at the RNC was taken, there were less Ron Paul delegate votes than anticipated.  Ron Paul supporters certainly recognize that Washington has gone astray.  By choosing Sarah Palin, John McCain has underscored his message that Washington is wayward, in dire need of reform.  John McCain’s acceptance speech included barbs against the Beltway Republicans that were every bit as stinging as Ron Paul’s barbs.  There are still vast areas of disagreement between the McCain camp and the Paul camp, but I think Paul supporters have to feel a bit more reassured about McCain after the Palin pick than they were before the Palin pick.

McCain’s Republican base has clearly become more solidified and energized, stealing thunder from Barr and Paul, thus allowing McCain to turn his attention toward independent voters and give Obama a run for his money.

CNN headed down same path as MSNBC

It’s a Johnny-come-lately to group think in comparison to MSNBC, but CNN is definitely defending Barack Obama and putting Sarah Palin in the cross-hairs.  Of course, some CNN personalities were always known to be on the left, like Carl Bernstein, Fareed Zakaria, Christiane Amanpour, and Jack Cafferty.  While some “impartial” CNN personalities, like Lou Dobbs and Larry King, remain above the fray, others, that used to appear to be independent, are now showing their true colors, including Campbell Brown, Soledad O’Brien, and Anderson Cooper.

Campbell Brown takes issue with Palin’s tale of the Alaskan Governor’s jet.  Palin put it on E-Bay.  Campbell Brown pointed out that the jet had to be sold at a loss to a broker because it didn’t sell on E-Bay.  What Campbell Brown doesn’t own up to is that Palin was truthful about putting the jet up for sale on E-Bay.  In fact, three attempts were made to sell the plane on E-Bay, so the Palin story is very true.  When no one came up with the minimum bid on E-Bay, it was sold at a loss to a broker, but at least the state of Alaska recouped some of the money put into the plane, let alone putting an end to the mounting price tag for fuel, maintenance, storage, etc., that the state was footing the bill for.   Wouldn’t it be nice if CNN did a survey of all the states to see which ones possessed a luxury jet that taxpayers financed for the use of their respective governors?  Or surveying which governors in recent history divested themselves of perks?  Such investigative reporting might reveal the secret to Palin’s high approval ratings.  Fat chance.  I don’t see CNN trying to figure out why the rest of the country doesn’t support their state governors as much as Alaska supports Palin.

Soledad O’Brien has taken the lead among CNN anchors investigating Sarah Palin on the parenting front.  Odd how male candidates and Hillary Clinton have never been under the gun by Soledad on the topic of parenting.  Clearly Palin is being singled out.  Soledad O’Brien and Campbell Brown have had to backpedal on these issues.  Erica Hill, among others, has been given the task of assembling focus groups in an attempt to justify O’Brien and Brown in their wielding of the double standard.

Then there’s the “trooper-gate” story being investigated by Drew Griffin.  The sound bites from this story will be circulated throughout the CNN broadcast day.  The full interview of the trooper reveals nothing that would disqualify Palin from office or answer the question of whether Palin abused her power.  An ex-administrator alleges that Palin fired him because he resisted firing the trooper.  The ex-administrator, Walter Monegan, was first given an opportunity to transfer to another position.  Instead, he chose to accept the termination and use it as a soap box to accuse Palin of interfering in personnel matters for personal reasons.  So far, reports only give us a “he said/she said” view, but Campbell Brown suspects the worst, because she assumes, according to what she said to Drew Griffin, that Palin doesn’t want the state legislature to wind up their investigation prior to the election.  She asked Drew Griffin if Palin had contrived any ways of postponing the resolution of the investigation until after the election.  Drew Griffin said, instead, that the legislature would likely try to move up the final disclosure date to October 10th.  I find the tag “trooper-gate” problematic because it suggests strongly that Palin did wrong even though the final conclusion on the matter has not been reached.  I would like to suggest that “good old boys” who get ousted from power are likely to not go quietly, and those on the wrong side of Palin’s reforms in the state legislature may be reveling in this opportunity to assign a demerit to Palin.

CNN is eager to use this unresolved “trooper-gate” to poke holes in McCain’s assertion that Palin is an accomplished reformer.  Uninvestigated by CNN is the whole Chicago political machine in dire need of reform that Obama would rather use as-is than shake up.  CNN is straining at gnats and swallowing camels.  Palin has clearly undertaken reforms that other politicians across the nation haven’t bothered to undertake.  CNN could reveal why voters are prone to distrust politicians in the first place by showing the prime examples of politicians who had the power to clean things up, but didn’t.  CNN shouldn’t be trying to disparage the reforms Palin has accomplished, because it sends a message to other politicians to not attempt reforms, because once one has caught the eye of the MSM for reforms, the MSM will try to tear the politician down.  Voters want politicians who will undertake reforms, and we don’t want the MSM to stand in opposition to them.

As for Campbell Brown’s much-ballyhooed interview of Tucker Bounds, McCain spokesperson, regarding Palin’s command role of the Alaska National Guard, it may be worthwhile to know the role that any state governor plays in being commander-in-chief over the National Guard.  However, Tucker Bounds is not the person who is likely to be the source of that information, and Brown (who knows that) wanted to run up the score on a spokesperson who was not thoroughly briefed on the matter.  Bounds should have anticipated the question, yes, but Brown should have shown better sportsmanship, and perhaps asked for a referral to someone who was qualified to answer the question.  Instead of locating the information by other means, CNN continues to air the same clip over again with the questions left unanswered.  I suggest that CNN isn’t interested in providing an answer.  They are interested only in a game of “gotcha,” where they managed to ask a question of a spokesperson that went unanswered.  Also, CNN ignores that Barack Obama has never had a command role over the National Guard, so they turn a blind eye to Obama’s glaring deficiencies, not acknowledging the emperor has no clothes.

MSNBC has chosen a liberal path as a way to boost their pathetic ratings.  CNN has much better ratings, and following the path of MSNBC will only erode their viewership.  CNN needs to reassess their commitment to the motto “no bias, no bull.”

RNC wraps up

I predict that McCain’s speech at the conclusion of the Republican National Convention was better received among Ohio’s rank-and-file Republicans than it was among the audience in attendance in Saint Paul, Minnesota.  I say that because of the audience responses to McCain’s promises of reform, which were warmly received in Saint Paul but would have been wildly and enthusiastically cheered in Ohio.  While McCain clearly showed that he never approved of the excesses perpetrated by Republicans in Washington, a lot of the people who DID approve of those excesses were in the Saint Paul audience, dampening the crowd response.

In other words, the Republicans of the much-reviled Bush Administration were very well represented in the convention hall.  I think that’s a shame.  It clearly is time to turn the page.

Ohio’s rank-and-file Republicans have suffered embarrassment for the last 4 years, as scandals tainted the Republican brand when Bob Ney, Bob Taft, Joe Deters, and others, turned out to be undesirables.  We rank-and-file Republicans in the Buckeye State are still dismayed by some of our state legislators and Congressional Representatives who still adhere to the principles of pay-to-play politics.  We are hungry for a better crop of Republican officeholders.  Clearly, if there are any Republicans anywhere in this nation eager for the McCain-Palin reform message, they are here in Ohio.

Several of the early speeches of the day were dreadful.  How in the world does Kansas put up with its singularly uninspiring U. S. Senator Sam Brownback.  His speaking manner was absolutely annoying.  I was at the point of turning away from C-Span coverage.  He was followed by a speaker that was nearly as bad: Oklahoma Congresswoman Mary Fallin.  They need professional help to improve their speaking abilities.  It’s a good thing the other networks talked over top many of these early speakers, because whatever lift Giuliani and Palin provided last night would have been quickly deflated if everybody heard those speeches.

McCain should have had nothing but passionate reform, reform, reform speakers tonight in order to keep the ball rolling from last night’s performances.  Speaking without passion and detouring from the reform message by some of the earlier speakers was dampening enthusiasm.

I think many of those Beltway Republicans in attendance were subtly trying to sabotage McCain by not reacting enthusiastically to the McCain reform message, like when he talked about the spending, the earmarks, the corruption, the selfishness.  Some of those selfish Beltway Bandits may be hoping that McCain falters this year, mistakenly thinking that they can be leader of the pack in 4 years.  Brownback certainly performed that way.  Some Beltway Bandits haven’t figured out that ordinary Americans are not proud of their behavior (and some may be in for a rude awakening when they’ve lost re-election bids this November).  Other Beltway Bandits (like U.S. Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska) perversely feel that they will not be denied the spoils, no matter what, and those are the ones that will sabotage McCain and welcome Obama as President.  Those are the ones that were resisting McCain’s message in Saint Paul.

I think it was necessary for McCain to own up to the fact that our Republican representatives in Congress have let down the voters, despite the bad vibes it caused among GOP bigwigs in Saint Paul, and even though it could be used as cannon fodder by Obama.  In order to give McCain any credibility at all for the prospects of reform, especially for any independents that may have been paying attention, McCain had to clearly show he was not going to lead the nation through 4 more years of a Bush Administration.

Overall, I think the McCain speech was effective, and I’m hoping that most viewers didn’t tune in until the later portions of the evening.  I did feel that stir of patriotism within me as McCain spoke with conviction of his solemn commitment to our nation.

Community organizers are . . . ?

CNN has picked up the gauntlet thrown down by Sarah Palin last night.  This morning, pundits on CNN are talking about the work of community organizers.

The description these pundits are giving of community organizers sounds to me like the description of social workers.  I’ve always thought of the two as distinctly different.  Am I mistaken?  Or are the job descriptions being purposely blurred to widen the scope of who should feel victimized by Palin’s comments?

Sarah Palin quipped that being a small-town mayor was sort of like being a community organizer, except that a mayor has real responsibilities.

Social workers absolutely were not included in the punch line.  Social workers often help people with special needs, and Palin has a child with special needs.  She promised families with special needs that if the Republican Presidential ticket is elected, they’d have an advocate in the White House in the person of Sarah Palin.

Social workers often serve as case managers that help disadvantaged people do many things, like, figure out how to navigate through household budget shortfalls, obtain re-training for displaced workers, address chronic medical issues, or assist with job searches.

This morning, the pundits were describing community organizers in the same terms.  My own assumptions, which may be wrong, were that community organizers often work for non-profits that have a specified mission, a defined scope, and that they try to cobble together advocacy groups within that scope so that lobbying local and state governments for the issues within that scope becomes more effective because it adds voices from the community to the voices at the non-profit, thus swelling the ranks of those calling for government action.

I welcome input.  Feel free to enlighten me.

Giuliani, Palin, stars of the RNC

I’m glad C-Span exists.  It’s so wonderful to hear the speeches of the conventions without the pundits talking over them all.  Unlike the DNC, where few non-prime time speeches were noteworthy, I’ve really enjoyed all the speeches of the RNC, even the early ones delivered (for two days running) by U.S. Senator Norm Coleman of Minnesota.

Of course, the first night of the RNC was cut short and pointed attention toward Hurricane Gustav.

The second night non-primetime speeches were about service.  These were speeches that were truly American, very much human, and not at all partisan.  Many of the speeches on service brought tears to my eyes.  I wish all Americans had a chance to hear those speeches.  There really wasn’t much partisanship in evidence until primetime, when former U.S. Senator from Tennessee, Fred Thompson, took the stage.   Thompson did a good job, in contrasting the Democrat Presidential ticket with the Republican Presidential ticket, but better speeches were to come.

Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, former Maryland Lieutenant Governor Michael Steele, and former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee all stirred the convention crowds with their speeches.

But the keynote speech by former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was magnificent.  I was cheering line after line after line.  Giuliani struck the right note time after time after time.  His speech, to me, seemed exactly right.

Sarah Palin’s speech wasn’t as steeped in criticism of Obama’s candidacy as Giuliani’s, but Palin clearly took ownership of the spotlight.  Her speech also scolded the media, and we’ll see how that challenge unfolds, as CNN and MSNBC lost no time at all in picking up the gauntlet.  We know sports events can get ugly when the referees take sides, and this election could get uglier, as some in the media were signaling that they were taking off the black-and-white-striped referee shirts and putting on player uniforms getting ready to take to the court themselves in order to beat Palin.

If the American people get the opportunity to view the Palin speech without commentary, it’ll resonate.  The media, I predict, is going to run interference with the Palin message, and it remains to be seen whether the American people can see through the smoke and mirrors.

Clearly, though, Giuliani and Palin were masterful.

McCain personality

Obama has seized upon a quip by a senior campaign advisor to McCain about fleshing out a portrait of McCain based on his personality rather than his views on the issues.  How disingenuous.  Of course, views on the issues are extremely important when running in a legislative race.  There is a place for defining character traits when running for the executive branch.

Obama, in making his campaign all about judgment, has certainly put personality front and center.

McCain has wanted to address the issues much more than Obama has.  McCain invited Obama to make a series of joint townhall appearances so that voters could get an apples-to-apples comparison between the two major party nominees on the issues, but Obama rejected the invitation.

If Obama wants to turn the campaign back to issues, then, by all means, resurrect the notion of joint townhall appearances.  Obama doesn’t want to be pinned down on issues.  He wants McCain to speak out on issues first so that Obama can find fault with what McCain says no matter how McCain says it.

Why has the McCain camp made a recent effort to flesh out McCain’s personality during the convention?  I think it’s an opportunity to push back against Obama’s biggest lie:  McCain is Bush and Bush is McCain.  If anyone is paying attention, McCain is laying to rest any notion that he is Bush.

McCain, I am certain will be happy to leave behind the “McCain is Bush” narrative to more fully address the issues, but Obama would have to abandon the “McCain is Bush” refrain.  Obama would have to agree to joint townhalls or, at the very least, more debates.  Obama has shown no inclination to move beyond “McCain is Bush,” so his criticism of the McCain camp for defining McCain’s personality is nothing but a gimmick.