Ed Morrison on Cleveland’s economic collapse

Ed Morrison hasn’t yet revealed the final findings of his biopsy of Cleveland, but top Cuyahoga County officials hardly even acknowledge the town is diseased as they continue their whimsical pursuit of a taxpayer-financed convention center boondoggle.

I agree with Ed Morrison’s timeline of Cleveland events, so I hope my readers will read this article he authored at New Geography.

Ed Morrison (along with George Nemeth) routinely explores potential remedies and recommendations for Northeast Ohio at Brewed Fresh Daily, a blog that I’ve included in my lefty blogroll since the inception of Buckeye RINO, so if you want to explore more of Ed Morrison’s writings, Brewed Fresh Daily can be a starting point.

Frankly, as I’ve noted before, I think Cuyahoga County voters should mix things up a little bit by electing more Republicans to office.  I don’t think it’s healthy for the Democrats to control everything.

I look forward to Ed Morrison’s followup article, which I reserve the right to agree or disagree with, but the first step for current county commissioners is to acknowledge how events have unfolded, acknowledge the pathology, and acknowledge the failure to remedy it.  Ed Morrison outlines all of this in the article.

Petition time for municipal elections

While it seems that the last election is barely over, especially since Obama doesn’t take office until next week, it’s already prime time to circulate candidacy petitions for office if you’d like to run for municipal court judge or for partisan municipal elections this year.

Yes, there are elections in odd-numbered years.

In Ohio, in odd-numbered years, there may be elections for municipal court judges, city councils, village councils, mayors and other municipal executive branch offices, township clerks, township trustees, and school boards.

Of course, there aren’t usually announcements about petition filing deadlines.  By keeping quiet about such deadlines, political party insiders are often able to get their own hand-picked persons on the bottom rungs of the political ladder without much opposition.

I feel that some of my readers would make excellent public servants.  That’s why I’m giving you the heads-up.  If you want to run for municipal court judge, or you want to run for city council in a city that holds partisan elections (if there’s no city charter, then such would be the case), then the filing deadline for your petitions to run in the May 5th primary election is before 4 pm on February 19, 2009 at your county’s Board of Elections office.  For example, Lorain and Elyria are cities that hold partisan elections for city council (and there are many more such cities all over the state).  Some cities have city charters that specify that elections for city council are to be non-partisan.  City charters could specify the petition filing deadline date for such non-partisan races, so you’ve got some homework to do if that applies to your city.  Otherwise, candidates for township, school board, and non-partisan municipal races have until August 20 to file petitions for the November 3rd general election.

For those it applies to, February 19 is just around the corner.

It’s not required that you raise any money in order to run for office, but if you think you might want to raise campaign money, you need to fill out a Designation of Treasurer form with the county Board of Elections.  On the form, you will be asked to name your campaign committee.  You don’t have to organize boatloads of people to form a campaign committee.  Your committee could conceivably consist of just you, yourself.  Your surname should be included in the campaign committee name.  For example, if I were going to be a candidate, I might use “Williamson for City Council,” “Vote Williamson,”  “Friends of Daniel Williamson,” “Elect Williamson,” “Williamson Campaign Committee,” or some other phrase that included my surname of Williamson when naming the committee.  The form will ask you to specify which election race that you are a candidate for.  The form will ask you to include the contact information for your campaign committee.  The committee must have a PHYSICAL address, not just some P.O. Box.  Also, a treasurer must be named for your committee.  Your treasurer could be yourself.  If you wish, you could name a deputy treasurer in addition to a treasurer  (and the deputy treasurer could be yourself if someone else was named as treasurer).  If any campaign money is received or expended, the treasurer and/or deputy treasurer will be responsible for submitting the required financial reports.  None of the information  on this Designation of Treasurer form has to be permanently etched in stone.  If, after you file the form, you decide to change the office you seek election to, or decide to change the name of the committee, or decide to change the address of the committee, or change treasurers, just amend the information by filling out a new Designation of Treasurer form with the county Board of Elections.

If you do raise and expend campaign money, the campaign committee will need to have its own bank account.  Campaign funds cannot be commingled with any other funds.  Keep in mind, when shopping around for a bank account for the campaign committee, that you may need to submit copies of canceled checks (front and back) for your  committee expenditures to accompany your campaign finance reports.  You should receive printed instructions on campaign finance reporting requirements from the Board of Elections office when you submit your Designation of Treasurer form.  At the very least, make sure the BoE workers direct you to a source of information that will provide you with the most up-to-date rules concerning campaign finance reporting.  I’ve been my own campaign treasurer in the past, and I’m happy to say that preparing campaign finance reports isn’t rocket science, so please don’t feel intimidated.

Now, about the matter of circulating petitions.  You can get petition forms from the county Board of Elections.  Take a black ink pen and a clipboard with you when you gather signatures, so that you make it easy for people to sign without having to fumble around.  How many signatures you must gather depends on the election you are running for, and whether you are running as a candidate of a political party or not.  Do not collect more than 3 times the minimum number of signatures required.  Pay attention to the form.  The blanks at the beginning of the form must be filled in prior to collecting any signatures.  The blanks at the end of the form, where the petition circulator certifies and attests to collecting and witnessing all the signatures on the form, is to be filled out after collecting the signatures.  On any given form, there must be only one petition circulator, so if two or more people are circulating petitions for you, they must do so on separate forms, not ever on the same form.  Those who circulate petitions for you must be currently registered Ohio voters, and they must not be from a different political party than the candidate, if running in a partisan race, so don’t enlist the help of underage high school students to circulate petitions for you, since they wouldn’t be registered voters.

I recommend getting “walk lists” of the precincts that you’ll be running for election in, from the BoE.  The “walk lists” should show you the names of registered voters with their street addresses and party affiliations.  This way, you can make sure you are gathering VALID signatures.  You wouldn’t want the Board of Elections throwing out your petitions because signatures were found not to be valid.  Workers at the Board of Elections will be verifying that the signatures on your form match the signatures they have on file from the voter registration records.  They’ll verify that the name, signature, address, and party affiliation all match up between the petitions and the voter records.  That’s why I recommend walk lists.  You won’t see voter signatures on the walk lists, but you will be able to match up names, addresses, and party affiliations, since the walk list is generated from the voter records that the BoE has.

In partisan races, signatures won’t be valid if the voters who signed were from a different political party than the candidate.  Thus, Republican candidates cannot collect valid signatures from those identified as Democrats on voter rolls, but they can collect valid signatures from other Republicans and from independents.  For yet another example, Green Party candidates cannot collect valid signatures from those identified on voter rolls as Republicans or Democrats, but they can collect valid signatures from independents.  Those voters with no political party affiliation shown on the voter rolls are considered independent voters, and, as independents, they can sign on to any partisan petition without changing their independent status.  After all, party affiliation is determined by which political party ballot you choose to vote on during the primary elections.  Those who request “issues-only” ballots during primaries, and those who don’t vote at all in primaries are considered independents.  Those listed as Republicans must have voted in a Republican primary election in the past.  Those listed as Democrats must have voted in a Democrat primary election in the past.  That’s how those voters became affiliated with political parties on the voter rolls.

In the past, when I’ve inadvertently collected a signature that I believed wasn’t valid or thought might not be valid, I used my pen to draw a line through that entry on my form in order to cross it out before submitting the completed forms to the Board of Elections.  I did not include the crossed-off entries in my total tally of signatures that I certified and attested to when I filled in the blanks at the end of the form after finishing the signature collection but before the form submission to the Board of Elections.  Such precautions helped me to get an accurate count of valid signatures so that I knew my petitions wouldn’t be thrown out by the Board of Elections, and so that I wouldn’t have my petitions challenged by political opponents, either.

A disclaimer:  The recommendations I’ve made here are based on my past experience.  Laws may vary from locality to locality, and some laws may have been changed since I last ran for office in 2004, so please consult your county’s Board of Elections office for current laws applicable to you and your campaign in your location, or else consult the office of Ohio’s Secretary of State.

I really hope that voters have excellent candidates to choose from in this year’s township, village, city, school board, and municipal court races.  If you blog readers are among those who step forward to be candidates this year, I wish you the best of luck.

An example of civic participation

Politics wouldn’t be so frustrating if more citizens actively participated in the process.  Being an informed citizenry before heading to a ballot box could make the election results, especially in the downticket races, much more bearable because the likelihood of making the best available choices would significantly improve.

But there are so many other fronts where active civic participation can reap huge dividends.  Would there be greater accountability from school districts if the turnout at school board meetings was always huge?  I tend to think so.  And if members of the community volunteered at the schools on a large scale, could educational outcomes improve?  I think it’s possible.  And what about citizens who serve on city committees, like streets and sidewalk committees, that keep city council members updated on pothole conditions . . . is there a use for that?  Of course there is.  How many townships have volunteer fire departments?  There are still quite a few of them.  Civic involvement improves our communities in so many ways.

Here’s an article from the Chronicle-Telegram about the start up of a block watch within an Elyria neighborhood.  The local citizens are pro-actively taking measures to prevent themselves from being targets of crime.  A police spokesperson, Lt. Andy Eichenlaub, told the C-T that there are 14 different neighborhood watch groups within the city of Elyria, and that number may grow.

Brandon Rutherford, a Democrat (I do tend to think in terms of party affiliation, don’t I?) that I’ve corresponded with from time to time, and a person I have a lot of respect for, has been orchestrating this particular block watch.  What amazes me is the amount of information being provided to residents.  Besides building relationships with the neighbors, experts are on tap to advise residents about securing businesses and residences, making use of child ID kits, curbing domestic violence, obtaining concealed carry permits, employing basic martial arts philosophies and techniques, and creating liaisons between the citizens and the police.

Part of the motivation behind this particular push is the concern over the elimination of 12 police officer jobs in Elyria.  If you’ve ever read the Harry Potter series, or seen the movies, this Elyria effort reminds me of part 5, “The Order of The Phoenix,” wherein Hogwarts students organize Dumbledore’s Army because they recognize deficiencies that their classes in Defense Against the Dark Arts won’t remedy.  With the current  bleak economic environment, any number of local governments may be faced with cutting safety services because tax revenues can’t keep up with expenses.  This neighborhood watch approach can send a strong signal to would-be criminals that citizens have no intention of becoming victims, despite the cutbacks.

I commend Brandon Rutherford and the others in his neighborhood who’ll be participating in this effort for taking these steps to look out for the best interests of their community.  I hope to see more such examples of civic participation in upcoming weeks and months.

Heightened Provenza alert

The city of Lorain has a Law Director, named Mark Provenza, who has repeatedly been charged with DUI’s.  In the most recent DUI episode, he demolished a porch of a residential dwelling in Lakewood.  I’ve frequently called for Provenza’s resignation.  My prior blog entries about Provenza may be found here, here, here, here, and here.

Word of Mouth blog, the Lorain Morning Journal, and the Elyria Chronicle-Telegram each have printed stories about the judge’s ruling in the Provenza case (WoM here, MJ here, C-T here).  Provenza is required to surrender his driver’s license, sit in jail for 90 days, pay fines and restitution, be treated for alcohol dependency, and remain on probation for 5 years.

The problem with the sentencing is that it still leaves a law breaker as Lorain’s top cop (see related posting at Muley’s Cafe).  Residents of the city lament Lorain’s crime rate, and if they are looking to the city to step up to the plate on reform, pity on them.  Lorain can’t even clean up city hall, let alone city streets.  It’s been suggested that Lorain needs an employee handbook, an articulation of the dos and don’ts required of all city employees.  How is implementation of such possible when the Law Director himself would be a violator?  And if the top cop is bending and breaking the laws, you can bet that a few cops out on their city beats are also crossing the line.  Is it coincidental that two such stories (C-T here and here, MJ here and here) surface in the papers on the same day as the Provenza ruling?  The proper tone is set at the top.  Provenza doesn’t set the proper tone.  He still has his law license and his job as Law Director, and there’s the rub.

Provenza chooses to remain a public official, though his actions make a mockery of his position.  I think a heightened Provenza alert is in order, as Provenza is deserving of increased public scrutiny on two counts:  he’s a public official, and he’s a public nuisance.  Will your house be the next one demolished by a drunken Provenza?  Just as we use neighborhood block watches to keep an eye on crime, we should have a Provenza watch, to make sure we’re safe from the next Provenza drunken driving debacle.  As a public figure, Provenza merits his own camera-toting posse of paparazzi, filming him whenever he gets together with friends to drink, filming him whenever he walks into a bar or liquor store, filming him whenever he gets into a motor vehicle (especially if he tries to get in the driver’s seat).  We should know who he hangs out with when he’s drinking, and what bars he likes to frequent.  We should know the name of the designated driver whenever he’s out partying with friends.  It is in the public interest to know such things.  The public has a right to know.  If any of you readers have info on Provenza’s drinking habits, feel free to let the public know in the comments here at my blog.

If Provenza would rather not have paparazzi trailing him, then he should resign.  So far, he’s showing no inclination of doing so.

The person responsible for Provenza being in office is none other than Lorain Dem party boss Anthony Giardini.  Giardini got Provenza in, and Giardini can get Provenza out.  If Provenza is reluctant to step down, then Giardini should publicly, as well as privately, request that Provenza resign.  Continuing to align the party machine behind Provenza as Law Director makes Giardini look more like a mob godfather than head of a political party devoted to democracy (spelled with a little “d”).  If Giardini has any concern whatsoever for his public image, he’d best be finding another candidate for his political machine to back for Lorain Law Director, and let it clearly be indicated that Provenza, should he stubbornly refuse to resign, is on his own, without the help of the machine that brought him into power.

If Giardini refuses to call for Provenza’s resignation, and a recall petition campaign succeeds, there will be egg on the face of Giardini, not just Provenza, and it will mark a crumbling of Giardini’s power.  Does Giardini choose to take that risk, and stick with Provenza?  If so, the time is fast approaching a showdown.  The people will have to assert their sovereignty over the government.

Keep the alert high.  Drastic measures may be needed.

Democrats control everything

Along the rust belt that hugs Lake Erie’s shores, Democrats have long enjoyed a near monopoly on municipal and county governments.  Incredibly, local Democrat politicians in northern Ohio have always found a Republican somewhere, no matter how distant, to pin the blame on for the area’s misfortunes, all the while turning a blind eye to their own corruptions.  The Democrats have just won the White House, have strengthened their majorities in both houses of Congress, control all but one of the statewide executive branch offices, and have even wrested control over the Ohio House of Representatives.

Eventually, as I mentioned when I endorsed Annette Butler for Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, somebody has to pound the message into voters’ heads that corruption exists among northern Ohio Democrat politicians, it’s taking its toll on the region’s economy, and that re-electing those Democrats won’t solve the problem.

How long will it take before Democrats run out of Republicans to blame, and start having to shoulder the blame they’ve earned, themselves?

[Update] Gov. Strickland, please help Lorain with its broken drawbridge

Lorain residents, and especially Lorain merchants, are getting a close-up look at the importance of transportation infrastructure in keeping the wheels of commerce greased.  In downtown Lorain, there is a drawbridge along U.S. Route 6 that crosses near the mouth of the Black River on the Lake Erie shore.  The name of the bridge is the Charles Berry Bascule Bridge.  The drawbridge doesn’t work.  It’s been stuck in the open position for months on end, creating detours for motorists and killing commerce along both banks of the river.  Not only is this an object lesson about the importance of infrastructure, it’s also an object lesson in red tape and the inefficiencies of state and county bureaucracies (in this case, the Ohio Department of Transportation is a prime example).  Ohio Governor Ted Strickland urged voters to support Tony Krasienko in Lorain’s mayoral race last year.  Guess what?  Krasienko won.  Now Krasienko needs Strickland’s support.  Now, Lorain needs Ohio’s executive branch to spring into action.

Governor Strickland, can you leverage some immediate relief for Lorain please?

Check out this pictorial from the Lorain County Photographer’s Blog to see the bridge with your own two eyeballs.  Then, from the same blog, hear the speeches of Lorain’s merchants and politicians while the residents gathered at the bridge to plea for assistance.

For the latest communication on the bridge matter, check out That Woman’s Weblog.  Things just aren’t happening.  Please, Governor Strickland, involve yourself in this matter long enough to get speedier results.

Of course, as noted before, I keep plugging for even more infrastructure.  The transportation grid upgrades I’ve proposed on the map below (the routes shown in red) would include at least one more bridge across the Black River, and it wouldn’t be a drawbridge.  It would also route traffic within a stone’s throw of the downtown at highway speeds of 65 m.p.h.

Lorain

More details on the mapped proposals are here, here, and here, at Word of Mouth.

[UPDATE] More pics and correspondence from Lorain County Photographer’s Blog.

The election results are in

Following up on the endorsement recap of yesterday, there were a few of the Buckeye RINO-endorsed candidates that won, but many of them lost.

Issue 6 went down to defeat, and I’m very happy about that.

The expected incumbent winners among those endorsed were Bob Latta of Ohio’s 5th Congressional District, and Jeff Wagner of Ohio House District 81.

There were newcomers elected, too.

Huron County elected Larry Silcox over Sharon Ward for an open commissioner seat.

Seneca County replaced long-time incumbent treasurer Marguerite Bernard with Damon Alt.

I never predicted who would win among those I endorsed . . . with one exception.  As soon as Matt Barrett stepped down from his seat in Ohio House District 58, I announced that the GOP would win the seat back from the Democrats.  I was correct.  Terry Boose emerges as the new state rep in the 58th District.

Though most of those I endorsed did not emerge victorious, I don’t regret making any of the endorsements that I made.  God bless you all, and God bless America.

Buckeye RINO endorsement recap

Today is the last day to get out and vote.  I urge all U.S. citizens to do so.

I’ve noted that traffic to the blog has been burrowing in to old posts to dig up what Buckeye RINO has said about the various campaign races currently underway.  I guess I should have made site navigation a little easier for the readers, so let me try to help out with this post and give you links to help you find what you are looking for.

U.S. President: I’m supporting John McCain.  Foreign policy is almost always the decisive factor for me when it comes to choosing the president, since Congress really doesn’t have a handle on the foreign policy agenda.  Congress DOES have a handle on the domestic policy agenda, which is why I give that less weight when making presidential voting decisions.  McCain’s foreign policy platform is the reason why, even though I opposed the bailout bill, I wasn’t lured to one of the minor party candidates who opposed the bailout.  If Joe Biden is sure that Obama will be tested by our enemies in the first 6 months if elected, you can be sure that the minor party candidates like Barr, Baldwin, and Nader would also be given that test.  McCain’s already been tested, and he passed the test.  I did write one entry about Obama and one of his foreign policy platform planks, but most of my writing about the McCain-Obama race was on the domestic front, much of it recorded in the 13-part HOPE ON series.  Here’s the link to HOPE ON Part 13, and there you’ll find links to the other twelve installments, and you’ll find those installments riddled with links, too.

Congress: I’ve endorsed Bob Latta in the 5th District, Bradley Leavitt in the 9th District, and Dave Potter in the 13th District.

Ohio’s ballot issues: I’m in favor of issues 1, 3, and 5, but I’m against issues 2 and 6.  I wrote an additional post about Issue 5, coupled with Issue 6.  I’ve also written extensively against issue 6, beginning with “Deep-six Issue 6,” and spelling out the economic downside of Issue 6, along with stances against Issue 6 from the viewpoints of Democrats, Libertarians, and Republicans.  I’ve linked to audio and video clips against Issue 6, I’ve urged voters to keep the zombies away and to frustrate lobbyists by voting no on 6, and I’ve expressed shocked surprise and disapproval when Issue 6 backers referred to the League of Women Voters as a “firing squad.”

General Assembly: Jeff Wagner in Ohio’s 81st House District.  I didn’t write about it, but in my own Ohio House District, the 80th, I voted for Ed Enderle for state rep.  When Matt Barrett’s problems came to light, I pointed to Terry Boose to pick up the baton for state rep in the 58th Ohio House District.  Heydinger was appointed to fill the rest of the Barrett term, but Heydinger decided to withdraw from the election because he felt the Ohio Democrat Party wanted to attach too many strings to him in exchange for financial campaign support.  Voters should think long and hard about that fact.  Terry Traster, a member of Amherst City Council that now is the Democrat standard-bearer, ideologically, doesn’t have a lot in common with the rest of the 58th District.  He’s not a good fit.  Lorain County Democrat politicians, like Traster, don’t often see eye-to-eye with the more rural and conservative voters of Huron County, southern Lorain County, and eastern Seneca County.  Terry Boose should be the pick of the 58th.

Seneca County: Damon Alt for Seneca County Treasurer.  Longtime incumbent Marguerite Bernard has to go.

Huron County: Larry Silcox for Huron County Commissioner.  Sharon Ward is not suitable.

Erie County: Mike Printy for Erie County Commissioner.

Cuyahoga County: Annette Butler for Cuyahoga County Prosecutor.

Lorain County: Nick Brusky and Martin O’Donnell for Lorain County Commissioner.  You can read more about the current state of affairs in Lorain County here, here, here, and here.

Annette Butler for Cuyahoga County Prosecutor

Do you know Bill Mason?  Since Bill Mason is the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, it might be to your advantage to know him, if you know what I mean.

I have noticed that the corruption investigations in Cuyahoga County aren’t being conducted by the law enforcement officials closest to the problems.  Isn’t it interesting that the Ohio Inspector General’s office is the one who finally catches up to some ODOT officials in Cuyahoga County after those officials had been milking the system for their own benefit for years?  I bet some people employed in local law enforcement had at least some knowledge of such behavior for quite some time, but they weren’t saying anything to anybody.  Isn’t it interesting that the FBI is investigating the Cuyahoga County Auditor and one of the Cuyahoga County Commissioners?  I bet some people employed in local law enforcement had a whiff that something was fishy, but they never followed up on it.  Maybe it helps to know Bill Mason.

I see some new Democrat candidates up for election in NEO with the blessing of the Democrat Party political machine.  Some of them claim they got some experience by working for Bill Mason.  Maybe it helps to know Bill Mason.

The friendship goes both ways.  If Bill Mason’s performance is substandard in some way, then, if you know him, you’ll offer excuses for him and keep giving him extra chances to do it right.  For example, if African-American Cleveland residents are busted for non-violent drug crimes, they are getting jail time, while the white suburban residents who are busted for non-violent drug crimes get to dry out at a rehab clinic like Betty Ford.  Now that an outside entity is making note of something that really was obvious to anyone paying attention, there are people like Regina Brett promising that Bill Mason will do a better job.

I’ve got a better idea.  Elect Annette Butler.  I think she’ll make sure to mitigate the racial discrepancies in the penalties the prosecution seeks from her first day on the job.  As she, herself, said, it’s a correction that can be made without extra money.  It’s a correction that can be made with hands-on direction.

Mason has criticized Butler’s experience as a federal prosecutor handling just civil cases.  Yet, with 24 years experience, Butler surely knows courtrooms.  Furthermore, in the corrupt environment of Cuyahoga County government where justice isn’t being served, I think it’s an appropriate time to look for someone from outside the Cuyahoga County criminal (and civil) court system to give it a much needed jolt.  I think I’m more trusting in a federal civil prosecutor these days than I am in any Cuyahoga criminal prosecutors.

Earlier this month, Cleveland Plain Dealer editor Brent Larkin  poo-poohed the county GOP’s reform proposals.  Perhaps the answer does not rest in a nine-member commission with a restructuring of the county’s executive offices.  Perhaps there are better proposals out there.  I’d be surprised if the bi-partisan task force from another part of the state had any better ideas, even if it’s backed by Governor Strickland and Speaker Husted (ha! Cleveland’s supposed to venerate Husted? oh, that’s funny!).  But there is a political dimension to the corruption that grips Cuyahoga County.  It has everything to do with the Democrat Party.  In this election, I can’t think of a better place to get started with reform than the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s office with the election of Annette Butler.

Brent Larkin wrote, “Voters don’t need Republicans to tell them Democratic-run county offices operate with bloated payrolls and obscene levels of patronage.”

Oh yeah?  Well maybe they do!

Maybe it needs to be shouted from every roof top every morning, noon, and night, that responsibility for the county’s corruption rests with the DEMOCRATS!

Larkin, I’m sure, would think that such a message wouldn’t be very well received by county residents, who are overwhelmingly Democrats.  Yeah, it probably shouldn’t be well recieved.  The message should probably stick in everybody’s craw.  It ought to rub them the wrong way and it ought to just keep on bothering them every time the message enters their minds.  They ought to get really irritated with the repetition of the message and want to lash out at the messenger.  They ought to get flat out pissed off, ready to sock somebody right in the jaw.  But it’s the truth, and it ought to be dealt with.

Maybe Cuyahoga County voters need to be told that a non-partisan effort isn’t going to fix the county, because it won’t specifically address Democrats.  Maybe Cuyahoga County voters need to be told that a bipartisan effort isn’t going to fix the county, because the Democrats will have a hand in rigging it.  Maybe Cuyahoga County voters need proposals that have more than just a “partisan taint” in order to get county government reform–in fact, maybe what Cuyahoga County voters is a wholly Republican plan to reform the county, because it will specifically address the corruptions of the Democrats and will not allow the Democrats a hand in sabotaging the reform efforts.

Or maybe, instead of restructuring government to accomplish reform, just maybe, all we need to do is replace Democrats in county office by electing some Republicans in key areas of county government.  Electing Annette Butler for Cuyahoga County Prosecutor might be a good start.  Stop making excuses for Bill Mason.  Vote him out.

Nick Brusky for Lorain County Commissioner

Don’t blame me for Ted Kalo.  In 2004, I voted for Rita Canfield.  I voted for Eric Flynn for the other open commissioner spot in 2004, too.

Lorain County Commissioner Ted Kalo is one of Lorain’s good old boys who is joined at the hip to the Democrat party boss of Lorain, Anthony Giardini.  One can look around the deteriorating city of Lorain to see the abundant evidence that the good old boys who wield power in Lorain are definitely not authorities on how to run a town, let alone a county (Kalo can’t even run a business).  I’ve occasionally posted blog entries about the good old boys of Lorain here, here, and here.  I also wrote about Kalo at Word of Mouth, and Kalo responded.  I’ll have more to say about Kalo later in this post.

Nick Brusky is a member of city council in Amherst, a city that is one of the few bright spots in the Lorain County economy.  The jobs picture has been bleak for much of the county, but some new jobs have been created in the Amherst area that Kalo likes to take credit for, but Nick Brusky and his colleagues in Amherst city government ought to receive equal credit, while Kalo shuns taking credit for the job losses elsewhere in the county.

Nick Brusky is running on a platform of good governance.  He has issued a contract with Lorain County that he wishes to be held accountable for if he is elected.  You can listen to Brusky reading his contract with Lorain on an audio podcast of a debate with Kalo hosted by Larry Wright of WEOL radio (930 on the AM dial).  You can also read the contract for yourself at Brusky’s website.  I think it’s important enough, though, to repeat the contract here.

As a citizen seeking to become one of your County Commissioners I propose not just to change policies of the county, but even more important, to restore the bonds of trust between the people and their elected representatives.

I offer a simple agenda for renewal, a written commitment with no fine print.
This year’s election offers voters the chance to transform the way County Government works. That historic change would be the end of government that is too big, and too easy with the public’s money.

On the first day I take office I will immediately propose the following major reforms, aimed at restoring the faith and trust of County Residents in their government:

First. No general fund tax increases.

Second. All agencies seeking an additional or renewal countywide property tax levies will be required to undergo an independent performance audit before being placed on the ballot. If the audit finds that we can propose a lower millage than requested, then the lower millage will go before the voters.

Third. Select a major, independent auditing firm to conduct a comprehensive audit of the County for waste, fraud or abuse.

Fourth. Increase fiscal prudence by limiting year to year budget increases to a maximum percentage accommodating for the change inflation plus population growth only.

Fifth. Let the people see how the County Commissioners spend their tax dollars by posting an “Online Checkbook” every month that lists each and every expenditure and its purpose.

Sixth. The use of Solid Waste money for billboards, handouts, and other advertising is wasteful and will be discontinued. Use Solid Waste money to fully fund recycling programs of Municipalities and Townships first. Any remaining money leftover will be given to the taxpayers in the form of rebates for purchasing items that will help them “go green.”

Seventh. Increase public participation by having our regular meetings at 7:00 pm, and televised live. Increase co-operation with more municipal and township officials by hosting Lorain County Community Alliance Meetings at night.

Respecting the judgment of my fellow citizens as I seek their mandate for reform, I hereby pledge my name to this Contract with Lorain County.

Sincerely,

Nicholas W. Brusky

When Kalo first took office in 2005 he renovated his commissioner’s office, complete with a large plasma-screen TV.  By 2007, he was spearheading an effort by the county commissioners to raise the county sales tax to raise general fund revenues, when he clearly didn’t show much in the way of careful restraint in the way of general fund expenses at the very start of his term in office.  Perhaps this champaigne taste on a beer budget is what gets Kalo in trouble with his flooring business.  That he would increase a sales tax that he, himself, on behalf of his flooring business, experienced difficulty in remitting prior to his run for office, is incomprehensible.  He ought to have learned his lesson firsthand that sales taxes can add a wrinkle to running a business, let alone an increase in the sales tax.  Kalo is a slow learner, if he learns anything.  Also, while the presidential candidate of his political party goes to great lengths to assure that the targets of his tax increases are only the very rich, Kalo seeks to increase a tax that every individual pays, with no exemptions if one is rich or poor or a senior citizen or a child or a student or whatever the case might be.

When Kalo and the other commissioners voted for a sales tax increase in 2007, Nick Brusky and other county residents decided to circulate petitions so that the voters could have a say on the matter.  Kalo really didn’t want the voters to decide the matter.  In the November 2007 elections, the sales tax increase ballot issue went down to defeat with 80% against the measure and only 20% in support of it.  The will of the people was made known to the county commissioners, yet Kalo and the other commissioners have vowed and are already preparing another attempt at a sales tax hike, overly confident that they’ll be re-elected.  This is why it is so important to elect Nick Brusky.  Only by voting Kalo and Lori Kokoski out of office, and replacing them with Brusky and Martin O’Donnell can the county continue to avoid being railroaded into higher taxes.

Kalo is too used to pulling all the strings as one of the good old boys.  He doesn’t appreciate that voters elect commissioners to impose the will of the people upon county government.  Instead, he seeks to impose the will of the county government upon the people.  That’s exactly backwards of what our Founding Fathers intended for those who hold legislative offices.

Brusky, with his contract with Lorain County, demonstrates that he understands that the commissioner’s job is to do the will of the people and subordinate the government of the county to the will of the people.

Nick Brusky and Martin O’Donnell can restore checks and balances to county government.  County residents can expect that these two, who’ve shown that they can help Amherst and Avon Lake, respectively, prosper and flourish, can bring their expertise to bear on behalf of the county, and help it prosper and flourish.  The best way to raise revenues, after all, is to rein in taxes, promote growth, and grow the tax base.

Finally, the county needs transparency, not back-room deals that Kalo hashes out with the other good old boys.  Nick Brusky has pledged to make county government transparent with the county’s revenues and expenditures posted on the internet so that any county resident can review the records with a few clicks of the mouse.  Citizens can be involved in their government–but only if Kalo and Brusky are elected.

Silcox vs Ward revisited

I’ve already endorsed Larry Silcox for Huron County Commissioner.  He’s the correct choice.  He knows that the Huron County budget must be downsized as the economic picture is projected to get gloomier.  His second priority, beyond getting the county’s house in order, is tackling the unemployment problem.  He wants to make sure that county residents have opportunities to earn money.

His opponent, Sharon Ward, was quoted in a story that appeared in the Norwalk Reflector saying:

“Every time we spend money at the mall in Sandusky, that money doesn’t go to our sheriff’s department, it goes to Erie County. We need more opportunities here.”

While I was out and about Erie County today, guess what I saw?

SWard1

If it’s hard to see the sign on the door of the Mercury Grand Marquis, let me show you a different angle.

SWard2

Granted, it’s not the Sandusky Mall, but this Sam’s Club is located in Erie County, not in Huron County.  The residents of Erie County, like myself, who see this advertisement on the side of the car, couldn’t cast a ballot for Sharon Ward even if we wanted to, so there’s no point in taking her campaign to the neighboring county.  Nope.  I think this car was parked in the Sam’s Club parking lot for the purpose of shopping.  I should point out that while Huron County doesn’t have a Sam’s Club, it does have a Walmart.  So how is it that the driver of this car with the Huron County license plates didn’t get the memo that a key plank of the Ward platform is to shop in Huron County, not Erie County?
SWard3

I stand by my earlier statement:

As for residents shopping within the county, it would help if there were more employment opportunities within the county.  If people who live in the county also work in the county, then their daily commutes would likely cause them to shop in the county.  Silcox is correct to put employment among the top priorities for the county.  Ward is putting the cart before the horse, hoping for people to spend without appropriate concern for hoping that people earn.

Ward’s emphasis on the spending of Huron County residents shows that she’s out of touch with the economic condition they are in.  The emphasis on spending is wishful thinking on Ward’s part that sales tax revenues that the county collects will grow, which suggests she’s not come to grips with the need to tighten the county budget.  Again, in light of the failures of Wall Street and the displeasure with which the bailout is being viewed, perhaps Sharon Ward shouldn’t be trying to highlight that her day job is as a financial planner.

[UPDATE X 2] Mentally challenged persons used as tools to stuff the ballot box

First off, a hat tip to Michelle Malkin for pointing me to this news report about a mentally challenged man hauled off to the polls in Georgia to vote against the ticket he intended to vote for, as reported by WALB.  Read to the end of this blog entry to learn of my own experience with a much more local flavor.

As Michelle Malkin writes in her own article, many families of the cognitively impaired feel a kinship toward Sarah Palin to the point that they favor the McCain ticket over the Obama ticket.  It is completely understandable that this Georgia man wanted to cast a vote for McCain.  Instead, he was compelled to vote for Obama by the worker who had abruptly taken him to the polls during an early voting period.  The rest of the man’s family is fuming.

As you already know, the U.S. Constitution allows citizens who are at least 18 years of age to vote.  The Constitution does not require that a person’s mental competence be measured to determine voting eligibility.  That is as it should be.  I have a younger brother who suffered a traumatic brain injury when he was a toddler.  His traumatic brain injury impaired him both mentally and physically.  He may not be the most sophisticated voter, but he does form his own impressions about the candidates, and he does feel that voting is important.  He’s ordinarily accompanied to the polls by a family member, and may need assistance if he’s unfamiliar with a new voting method or voting machine.  If he were denied the right to vote, his sense of being ostracized from the rest of society would be heightened beyond what it already is.

During my first campaign for state representative in 2002, I wore out a lot of shoe leather.  I really didn’t have much campaign funding to speak of, so I used walk lists of registered voters obtained from the Lorain County Board of Elections and trudged from door-to-door to meet voters to deliver my campaign message in person.

While thus engaged in canvassing residences in Elyria Township, I happened upon an address that turned out to be a rather large building.  The walk list indicated that a somewhat large number of voters resided within.  I knocked on the door, and someone came to the door to greet me.  I began to tell her of my campaign, but she cut me off, informing me she was not a resident of the building.  She said that she was merely a staff worker there.  I told her that I wanted to meet the voters who resided there.  She denied my request, saying that the residents of the building were profoundly retarded, thus it would be inappropriate to allow me to enter.  My attempts to enter and meet the residents, even by scheduling an appointment, were futile.  I moved on.

But I have some questions:

  • Would the incumbent state representative, Joe Koziura, been allowed to visit the premises by virtue of his position as an officeholder?  I can’t picture the staff telling Joe Koziura to take a hike.
  • What was the harm in paying a visit, when I had ample evidence to prove my identity and show that I posed no safety risk, even though the residents might have no understanding of politics?
  • Can they be too profoundly impaired to meet candidates yet be not too impaired to be taken to a polling booth to cast votes for candidates?
  • If they are taken to a polling place by a staff member so that they can vote, what informs their vote, if access to the candidates has been denied?

For that final question, I suggest that the WALB report from Albany, Georgia, provides the answer.  The staff members seize upon these special needs individuals and use them as tools for stuffing the ballot box in favor of the candidate preferred by staff members.

One final note about the staff members at the Elyria Township facility mentioned above:  The staff members are unionized.

[UPDATE 10/29/08] Michelle Malkin, again, picks up the story.  This time it’s in California.

[UPDATE 10/31/08] Yet again, Michelle Malkin picking up a story in Iowa.

Lorain needs to bridge the gap

Lorain has been experiencing a bit of a bridge problem.  Discussion of it has cropped up in the local print media and in local blogs.  To get a look at the problem, yourself, taka a look here, at That Woman’s Weblog (echoed here, at Muley’s Cafe), or have a look here, at Word of Mouth.  The severity of the problem is discussed here and here in the Lorain Morning Journal, as well as here in the Elyria Chronicle-Telegram.

These concerns illustrate what I wrote about here, here, and here which is why I’m still talking about stuff like this.
Lorain

What would be fair for Provenza?

The Sandusky Register is reporting that a man who rammed a truck into a motel room was sentenced to 10 years in prison.

Time to make a comparison to someone else.

Mark Provenza, Law Director for the city of Lorain, crashed his vehicle into a house, demolishing a porch, in Lakewood.  It’s the 4th time Provenza has been charged with a DUI since he became Law Director.

What penalty should Provenza receive?

Alt for Seneca County Treasurer

As the Tiffin Advertiser-Tribune points out, Marguerite Bernard has been Seneca County Treasurer since 1979.  In a county position that usually doesn’t get spotlighted, incumbency has its advantages, and Marguerite Bernard has enjoyed those advantages for many, many years.

But all is not well in the Seneca County Treasurer’s office.  I’ve blogged about the problems before, noting the copious and merited attention the Advertiser-Tribune has given to imbalanced county checking accounts.

Her opponent for the Treasurer’s office in the upcoming election is Damon Alt.  Casting a vote for Alt is not just a protest vote.  Casting a vote for Alt is not just a referendum on Bernard.  Alt is a superior candidate for the Treasurer’s office.

Damon Alt is both a C.P.A. and a lawyer.  This is a time when the Seneca County Treasurer needs to be a person who makes sure that all the “i”s are dotted and all the “t”s are crossed.  Alt will restore accountability to the Treasurer’s office, making sure all jots and tittles are in their proper places.

The county checkbook imbalances were not caused by embezzlement or misallocation of funds.  They were caused by inattention to detail.  Bernard did not match bank statements against her own paperwork.  Had the bank errors been caught right away, tracking them down would have been easy.  But since months and months and months passed, tracking down the bank errors has been time-consuming and difficult to nail down.

Perhaps, in addition to voting for Alt, Seneca County should also shop around for a new bank.