From: David Kormanik <dkormanik@ohiojobsandgrowth.org>
To: williamsonworks@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:36:54 PM
Subject: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanDaniel,
Hello, my name is David Kormanik and I represent the Ohio Jobs & Growth Plan.
Over the coming weeks and months, I will keep you informed on our activities and make sure you have the latest information on our plan to bring four first-class casinos to Ohio —one in Cleveland , Columbus , Cincinnati , and Toledo .
In the meantime, feel free to follow us on Facebook and Twitter for the latest news, endorsements and campaign updates.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions you have!
Thanks,
David Kormanik
Ohio Jobs & Growth Plan
614-370-2363
__________________________________________________________
From: Daniel Williamson [mailto:williamsonworks@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:14 PM
To: David Kormanik
Subject: Re: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanQuestion: If the casino proposal represents a plan for Ohio ‘s jobs and growth, why just cherry pick 4 locations?
Question: If America is, by its nature, is intended to be a land of opportunity and free enterprise, and if Ohio voters favor legalization of casinos, why limit competition by creating a casino cartel, as your proposal intends, instead of allowing anyone to open up, own, and operate casinos wherever the zoning of Ohio’s communities permit them?
–Daniel Williamson
__________________________________________________
From: David Kormanik <dkormanik@ohiojobsandgrowth.org>
To: Daniel Williamson <williamsonworks@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 11:36:32 AM
Subject: RE: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanDaniel,
Please contact our spokesperson, Bob Tenenbaum (news@ohiojobsandgrowth.org). He will be able to answer the questions below, as well as address any other concerns you may have.
I have also attached a document containing information on our proposal.
Thanks,
David Kormanik
Ohio Jobs & Growth Plan
614-370-2363
_________________________________________________________
From: Daniel Williamson <williamsonworks@yahoo.com>
To: news@ohiojobsandgrowth.org
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 1:25:31 PM
Subject: Fw: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanQuestion: If the casino proposal represents a plan for Ohio ‘s jobs and growth, why just cherry pick 4 locations?
Question: If America is, by its nature, intended to be a land of opportunity and free enterprise, and if Ohio voters favor legalization of casinos, why limit competition by creating a casino cartel, as your proposal intends, instead of allowing anyone to open up, own, and operate casinos wherever the zoning of Ohio’s communities permit them?
–Daniel Williamson
______________________________________________________
From: Daniel Williamson [williamsonworks@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 3:49 PM
To: news@ohiojobsandgrowth.org
Subject: Re: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanQuestion: Didn’t you pledge to answer questions?
–Daniel Jack Williamson
______________________________________________________
From: ” Tenenbaum, Bob ” <BTenenbaum@themilenthalgroup.com>
To: Daniel Williamson <williamsonworks@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 12:50:24 PM
Subject: RE: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanIs this for a publication, or are these just personal questions? (We will answer either way, I’m just curious.)
______________________________________________________
From: Daniel Williamson [williamsonworks@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 4:09 PM
To: Tenenbaum, Bob
Subject: Re: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanI definitely intend to blog about the casino issue multiple times this year. I’m surprised that you have a two-track answering system, one for on the record, and one for off the record.
Consider this “on the record.”
–Daniel Jack Williamson
From: ” Tenenbaum, Bob ” <BTenenbaum@themilenthalgroup.com>
To: Daniel Williamson <williamsonworks@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 1:13:02 PM
Subject: RE: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanWe don’t ever answer “off the record,” and there is no two-track system. As I said, I was just personally interested.
_______________________________________________
From: Daniel Williamson [williamsonworks@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 4:31 PM
To: Tenenbaum, Bob
Subject: Re: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanI recant. I’m so sorry, I apologize. I shouldn’t be flippant like that, especially when the information is offered to me so graciously.
But, yes, I’ll be blogging about the casino issue.
–Daniel Jack Williamson
____________________________________________
From: David Kormanik <dkormanik@ohiojobsandgrowth.org>
To: williamsonworks@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2009 4:18 PM
Subject: YouTube Petition Filing VideoDear Daniel,
The Ohio Jobs & Growth Committee released a video today on Facebook and YouTube highlighting last Thursday’s petition filing.
It includes footage of the 200+ petition boxes containing over 850,000 signatures (double what is necessary to qualify) being submitted to the Secretary of State’s office.
I invite you to watch the video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DINbOCW6JxA.
Please let me know if you need any additional information about the campaign! Thanks for your time.
Sincerely,
David Kormanik
Ohio Jobs and Growth Plan
___________________________________________________
From: Daniel Williamson [mailto:williamsonworks@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 11:53 PM
To: Tenenbaum, Bob
Subject: Re: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanI’ve been waiting for your answer to the two questions I asked. Plenty of time has elapsed. I do intend to blog about the casino gambling issue. I will include your answers in my blog if I can receive those answers in the next 48 hours. If I do not receive answers, I will compose a blog entry, anyway, even without answers.
Daniel Jack Williamson
Buckeye RINO_____________________________________________________
From: ” Tenenbaum, Bob ” <BTenenbaum@themilenthalgroup.com>
To: Daniel Williamson <williamsonworks@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 6:34:02 AM
Subject: RE: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanHere you go:
Question: If the casino proposal represents a plan for Ohio ‘s jobs and growth, why just cherry pick 4 locations?
Casino gaming is a business, and as such needs to be looked at in terms of what is practical. It is clear Ohio can support four casinos in the state’s four largest cities, where they will create jobs, contribute to the revitalization of our largest urban areas, and generate tax revenues to help support local governments and schools throughout the state. Every state that allows casino gaming limits the number of licenses available. The supporters of this issue believe that the most practical solution for Ohio is to place casinos in the state’s four largest cities, while making sure that every county and every school district in Ohio benefits from the tax revenue the casinos will generate.
Question: If America is, by its nature, intended to be a land of opportunity and free enterprise, and if Ohio voters favor legalization of casinos, why limit competition by creating a casino cartel, as your proposal intends, instead of allowing anyone to open up, own, and operate casinos wherever the zoning of Ohio’s communities permit them?
The notion that “anyone” can “open up, own and operate casinos wherever the zoning of Ohio’s communities permit them” implies that Ohio could support 10, or 20, or maybe 50 casinos spread throughout the state. It’s simply a totally impractical idea. Every state that has permitted casino gaming has limited the number of licenses available. In addition, opening up the state to casino gaming requires an amendment to the Ohio Constitution, and that requires a campaign that someone has to fund. The developers of the casinos proposed in this ballot issue have been very open about the fact that they are supporting the campaign because they want to develop these casinos. They have also committed to investing a minimum of $250 million of private money in each casino . . . a significant contribution to the economy of the state and its four largest cities.
Bob Tenenbaum
Spokesman for the Ohio Jobs & Growth Plan
250 Civic Center Dr., Suite 440
Columbus OH 43215
(614) 573-1377
_____________________________________________________
From: Daniel Williamson [mailto:williamsonworks@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2009 9:45 AM
To: Tenenbaum, Bob
Subject: Re: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanThank you very much. This will be posted soon.
Daniel Jack Williamson
Buckeye RINO_______________________________________________
From: Daniel Williamson [mailto:williamsonworks@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 10:18 AM
To: Tenenbaum, Bob
Subject: Re: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanMy initial reaction: What you refer to as practical and impractical serves to highlight one of the big differences between the casino industry and most other industries in a free market system: Sustainability. Casinos require a very structured marketplace because they cannot be sustained in a free marketplace.
–Daniel Williamson
________________________________________________________
From: “Tenenbaum, Bob” <BTenenbaum@themilenthalgroup.com>
To: Daniel Williamson <williamsonworks@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 10:20:21 AM
Subject: RE: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanIf you’re opposed to allowing the casino industry in Ohio , I respect your viewpoint. But this is for the voters to decide. Independent polls have consistently shown that Ohioans favor allowing casino gaming in concept. It is our belief that they have defeated four previous issues because they did not provide the kind of economic development and tax revenues the voters were looking for. We think this issue does . . . and therefore believe it has a very good chance of gaining passage in November.
_____________________________________________________
From: Daniel Williamson [mailto:williamsonworks@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 10:29 AM
To: Tenenbaum, Bob
Subject: Re: Hello from the Ohio Jobs & Growth PlanOf course. I want the voters to decide, also. I think this dialogue will be instructive.
–Daniel Williamson
_________________________________________________________
Dear readers: This is raw source material. I plan to expand on this information in the near future. Stay tuned . . .
July 29, 2009 at 12:17 pm
[…] July 29, 2009 Check out DJW”s Buckeye Rino blog https://buckeyerino.com/2009/07/28/e-mail-correspondence-with-casino-issue-spokesmen/ […]
July 29, 2009 at 12:20 pm
Thanks for keeping on top of this issue Cheers Loraine
July 29, 2009 at 2:25 pm
[…] E-mail correspondence with casino issue spokesmen […]
July 29, 2009 at 2:30 pm
Thanks, Loraine. There’s a boatload of information straight from the horse’s mouth contained within this correspondence. Feel free to write entries at your own blog based on this source material.
July 31, 2009 at 7:55 pm
[…] E-mail correspondence with casino issue spokesmen […]
August 5, 2009 at 5:29 pm
[…] E-mail correspondence with casino issue spokesmen […]
August 13, 2009 at 2:40 pm
[…] E-mail correspondence with casino issue spokesmen […]
August 29, 2009 at 4:49 pm
[…] written 5 prior blog entries about this year’s casino issue that can be found here, here, here, here, and here. I’ve written many more posts on gambling dating back to last […]
September 3, 2009 at 8:49 pm
[…] effect. Prior Buckeye RINO coverage of this year’s Issue 3 includes a post consisting of my email communications with casino spokespersons, a post showing the Issue 3 proposal is far inferior to the principles that led to the founding of […]
October 29, 2009 at 7:49 am
[…] RINO at all, you know I’m very emphatic on this point. NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO and NO. Got […]
March 28, 2011 at 11:31 pm
[…] Let’s see . . . there are at least . . . let me count (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, . . .) at least 22 blog posts chiefly about my […]